<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>APPLE iPhone and iPod &#187; Rejected</title>
	<atom:link href="http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/tag/rejected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net</link>
	<description>About Apple iPhone and Apple iPod</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Former Apple TV Engineer Claims Steve Jobs Had Rejected The New Apple TV Interface</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2012/03/former-apple-tv-engineer-claims-steve-jobs-had-rejected-the-new-apple-tv-interface/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2012/03/former-apple-tv-engineer-claims-steve-jobs-had-rejected-the-new-apple-tv-interface/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 03:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Former]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/?p=5087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unlock For iPhone 3GS, iPhone 3G On iOS 4.2.1 Released [Updated] posted on November 28, 2010 How To Perform Untethered Jailbreak On Your iPhone 4/3GS Without Updating Baseband Using Redsn0w For iOS 5.0.1 [Updated] posted on December 27, 2011 How To Perform Untethered Jailbreak On Your iPhone 4, iPhone 3GS Running iOS 5.0.1 Using Redsn0w [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unlock For <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  3GS, <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  3G On iOS 4.2.1 Released [Updated]<br />
 posted on November 28, 2010<br />
 How To Perform Untethered Jailbreak On Your <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  4/3GS Without Updating Baseband Using Redsn0w For iOS 5.0.1 [Updated]<br />
 posted on December 27, 2011<br />
 How To Perform Untethered Jailbreak On Your <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  4, <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  3GS Running iOS 5.0.1 Using Redsn0w<br />
 posted on December 27, 2011<br />
 How To Jailbreak <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  4, <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  3GS On iOS 4.2.1 Using Greenpois0n [Windows]<br />
 <span id="more-5087"></span> posted on February 6, 2011<br />
 How To Jailbreak <b><i>iPod</i> </b>  Touch 3G, <b><i>iPod</i> </b>  Touch 4G Using Limera1n [Windows]<br />
 posted on October 10, 2010<br />
 posted on December 7, 2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2012/03/former-apple-tv-engineer-claims-steve-jobs-had-rejected-the-new-apple-tv-interface/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Accused Of Copying iOS 5 Wi-Fi Sync Feature From Rejected Jailbreak App</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2011/06/apple-accused-of-copying-ios-5-wi-fi-sync-feature-from-rejected-jailbreak-app/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2011/06/apple-accused-of-copying-ios-5-wi-fi-sync-feature-from-rejected-jailbreak-app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 22:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Accused]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jailbreak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2011/06/apple-accused-of-copying-ios-5-wi-fi-sync-feature-from-rejected-jailbreak-app/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in iOS 5, will finally allow Apple to cut the cord. They are also our favorite features as we&#8217;ve always longed for the day when iOS device such as iPad and iPhone won&#8217;t need a computer. that we&#8217;ve covered last year, already allowed users to wirelessly sync their jailbroken iOS device with over a Wi-Fi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in iOS 5, will finally allow <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  to cut the cord. They are also our favorite<br />
 features as we&#8217;ve always longed for the day when iOS device such as iPad and <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  won&#8217;t need a computer.<br />
 that we&#8217;ve covered last year, already allowed users to wirelessly sync their jailbroken iOS device with<br />
 over a Wi-Fi network.<br />
 &#8220;, which forced him to release the app on Cydia. It has been available on Cydia for the last 13 months for $9.99.<br />
 <b><i>Apple</i> </b> ’s feature <span id="more-2498"></span> not only gets the same name, but as you can see below, the Wi-Fi Sync icon also looks quite identical to the icon of Wi-Fi Sync jailbreak app.<br />
 Wi-Fi Sync 2.0 icon (left) and <b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#8216;s Wi-Fi Sync icon (right)<br />
 caught up with the UK-based developer to get his reaction. He had this to say:<br />
 &#8220;Obviously I was fairly shocked,&#8221; said Hughes, referring to his reaction on Monday when he saw the new feature promoted on <b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#8216;s website. &#8220;I&#8217;d been selling my app with that name and icon for at least a year. <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  knew that, as I&#8217;d submitted it to them, so it was surprising to see that.&#8221;<br />
 He said an <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  developer relations representative named Steve Rea personally called him prior to sending a formal rejection email to say the app was admirable, but went on to explain there were unspecified security concerns and that it did things not specified in the official <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  software developers&#8217; kit.<br />
 It is likely that <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  had already started working on the Wi-Fi Sync feature before Hughes submitted the app to the App Store, but the similarities have raised some eyebrows.<br />
 It is difficult to believe that <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  copied the feature from the jailbreak app &#8211; as the functionality has always been one of the most requested features by iOS users, but let’s hope that Hughes is rewarded by <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  in some way for being the first to introduce the feature. If you want the Wi-Fi sync feature before iOS 5 is released this fall, then you can purchase and install<br />
 from Cydia.<br />
 Do you think <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  copied from the jailbreak app? Please share your views in the comments below.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2011/06/apple-accused-of-copying-ios-5-wi-fi-sync-feature-from-rejected-jailbreak-app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Jobs Calls Developer Of Rejected iPad App</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/11/steve-jobs-calls-developer-of-rejected-ipad-app/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/11/steve-jobs-calls-developer-of-rejected-ipad-app/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 09:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/11/steve-jobs-calls-developer-of-rejected-ipad-app/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arumugam, a former Microsoft Employee quit his job back in 2008 and started his own iOS app developing company called Cascade Software. He was working on a new app for Apple &#39;s iPad – known as ). He was almost done developing the app when he hit an annoying keyboard bug, which made it impossible [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arumugam, a former Microsoft Employee quit his job back in 2008 and started his   own iOS app developing company called Cascade Software. He was working on a new app for <b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#39;s iPad – known as<br />
 ).<br />
 He was almost done developing the app when he hit an annoying keyboard bug, which made it impossible to dismiss the keyboard using approved/public methods/APIs.<br />
 Since this bug was caused due to an issue with <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  SDK, this was something Arumugam <span id="more-1827"></span> could not fix. He had one alternative though – using a private API to fix it, which is not allowed according to the terms of the iOS Developer agreement. He used the private API and submitted his app for review and was soon greeted with a politely worded rejection letter. Unperturbed, he filed a review appeal and talked at length with folks from <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  to get his iPad app approved.<br />
 After submitting the review petition, he wasn&#39;t sure how much time it wold take for <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  to respond. That was when he decided to tell Steve Jobs himself about his plight.  Two hours after  sending the e-mail, while out at a kids arena, he received a call from <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  with the person at the other end saying, “<br />
 Ram, this is Steve<br />
 ”. Ram writes:<br />
 A couple of hours after I sent the email, I was at a noisy soccer (for kids) arena when I heard my <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  ring. The caller-id, the caller saying “Ram, this is Steve” and that he was calling from <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  did suggest that it could really be Steve Jobs. He confirmed it when I asked.<br />
 The two talked about the reason for the rejection. After the call, Ram decided to remove the private API, after which the App was approved to the App Store. Since then, the app has gone on to become the number one App in the Finance section of iPad apps.<br />
 Like we mentioned before, Steve Jobs is known to reply to e-mails from customers – but a direct phone call was totally unheard of  &#8211; until now. Senior Vice President of <b><i>Apple</i> </b> , Phil Schiller has like Steve, replied to e-mails and has even called people up in rare cases related to App Store issues.<br />
 It is great to see the hands on approach of Steve Jobs, CEO of the second most valuable company in the world. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/11/steve-jobs-calls-developer-of-rejected-ipad-app/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wi-Fi Sync iPhone App Released On Cydia After Apple Rejected It Due To &#8220;Security Concerns&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/05/wi-fi-sync-iphone-app-released-on-cydia-after-apple-rejected-it-due-to-security-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/05/wi-fi-sync-iphone-app-released-on-cydia-after-apple-rejected-it-due-to-security-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 14:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concerns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cydia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Released]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/05/wi-fi-sync-iphone-app-released-on-cydia-after-apple-rejected-it-due-to-security-concerns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;While he agreed that the app doesn&#39;t technically break the rules, he said that it does encroach upon the boundaries of what they can and cannot allow on their store. He also cited security concerns.&#8221; is not entirely surprising. We had noted that the communication between the &#8221; and hence the app could be rejected. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;While he agreed that the app doesn&#39;t technically break the rules, he said that it does encroach upon the boundaries of what they can and cannot allow on their store. He also cited security concerns.&#8221;<br />
 is not entirely surprising. We had noted that the communication between the<br />
 &#8221; and hence the app could be rejected. Also, it is highly possible for <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  to introduce this functionality in one of the future versions of <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  OS. This could be <span id="more-1222"></span> one another reason why the app was not approved.<br />
 Nevertheless, if you have<br />
 , you may still download the application. Hughes has revealed that the app is now available on BigBoss repository at Cydia for $9.99. However, do note that the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  app currently works only on the Mac though the developer has mentioned that he plans to release a Windows version of the application &#8221;<br />
 &#8220;. Support for iPad is also likely to be made available via a free update soon.<br />
 If you buy the jailbreak app, don&#39;t forget to give us feedback in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/05/wi-fi-sync-iphone-app-released-on-cydia-after-apple-rejected-it-due-to-security-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pulitzer Prize Winner Reveals His iPhone App Was Rejected For Ridiculing Public Figures</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/04/pulitzer-prize-winner-reveals-his-iphone-app-was-rejected-for-ridiculing-public-figures/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/04/pulitzer-prize-winner-reveals-his-iphone-app-was-rejected-for-ridiculing-public-figures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 10:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pulitzer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reveals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ridiculing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/04/pulitzer-prize-winner-reveals-his-iphone-app-was-rejected-for-ridiculing-public-figures/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[, Fiore has revealed that his by Apple late last year on grounds that the content on his application ridiculed public figures. The &#8220;In December, Apple rejected his iPhone app, NewsToons, because, as Apple put it, his satire “ridicules public figures,” a violation of the iPhone Developer Program License Agreement, which bars any apps whose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>, Fiore has revealed that his<br />
 by <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  late last year on grounds that the content on his application ridiculed public figures. The<br />
 &#8220;In December, <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  rejected his <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  app, NewsToons, because, as <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  put it, his satire “ridicules public figures,” a violation of the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  Developer Program License Agreement, which bars any apps whose content in “<b><i>Apple</i> </b> ’s reasonable judgement may be found objectionable, for example, materials that may <span id="more-1124"></span> be considered obscene, pornographic, or defamatory.&#8221;<br />
 <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  attached screenshots of the offending material, including an image depicting the White House gate crashers interrupting an Obama speech. Two other grabs include images referencing torture, Balloon Boy, and various political issues.&#8221;<br />
 Fiore has however indicated that he is still interested in distributing content via the mobile phone platform. He says:<br />
 This is not the first time an application has been rejected over potentially objectionable cartoons. You may recall the controversy surrounding the<br />
 &#8220;. Bobble Rep was an interesting application that provided the contact information of all US senators to users. The handy application was initially rejected by <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  over claims that the caricature that accompanied the contact information of senators was objectionable in nature. However, <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  retracted its stance later on.<br />
 Fiore has noted that while he has not resubmitted the app for approval, he is still hopeful about launching an<br />
 soon. Laura McGann writes:<br />
 &#8220;Fiore has not resubmitted his app, saying he’d heard about the experiences of others cartoonists and wasn’t in a position to get into a fight with <b><i>Apple</i> </b> . Still, he has a hunch <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  will eventually change its mind on him, as it has with other cartoon apps. “They seem so much more innovative and smarter than that,” he told me.&#8221;<br />
 What do you think? Is <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  right in rejecting apps that are satirical in nature? Or do you think it&#39;s a mistake due to the manual nature of the approval process and will get approved if he resubmits his <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  app? Let us know your views in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/04/pulitzer-prize-winner-reveals-his-iphone-app-was-rejected-for-ridiculing-public-figures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grooveshark iPhone App For Online Music Streaming Released On Cydia; After It Was Rejected By Apple</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/02/grooveshark-iphone-app-for-online-music-streaming-released-on-cydia-after-it-was-rejected-by-apple/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/02/grooveshark-iphone-app-for-online-music-streaming-released-on-cydia-after-it-was-rejected-by-apple/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 16:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[after]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cydia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grooveshark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Released]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/02/grooveshark-iphone-app-for-online-music-streaming-released-on-cydia-after-it-was-rejected-by-apple/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grooveshark is a free web based music streaming service that allows users to upload, share and stream tracks from a massive catalog of songs. The new iPhone app will allow their Premium/VIP members of the service use their to search for music from the huge database. Additionally, users may also organize tracks into playlists, mark [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grooveshark is a free web based music streaming service that allows users to upload, share and stream tracks from a massive catalog of songs. The new <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  app will allow their Premium/VIP members of the service use their<br />
 to search for music from the huge database. Additionally, users may also organize tracks into playlists, mark tracks as favorite and listen to songs offline. The web based alternative available on the company&#39;s website runs <span id="more-937"></span> on the Adobe Flash platform and hence is not accessible via the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b> &#39;s mobile Safari web browser.<br />
 .<br />
 We expect Grooveshark&#39;s slick app interface to be a hit among jailbroken <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  users, but the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  app isonly available if you are a VIP member, which you can become by paying $3 per month or $30 per year. If you are<br />
 eager to download the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  app, you may do so from the Big Boss repository on Cydia. Please check it out and let us know your views.<br />
 ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2010/02/grooveshark-iphone-app-for-online-music-streaming-released-on-cydia-after-it-was-rejected-by-apple/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google: Apple rejected Google Voice</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/09/google-apple-rejected-google-voice/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/09/google-apple-rejected-google-voice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/09/google-apple-rejected-google-voice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Voice, shown here running on Android, was in fact rejected from the App Store, Google said Friday. (Credit: Screenshot by Rafe Needleman/CNET) Updated 10:25 a.m. PDT with additional details, and at 10:52 a.m. with comment from Apple . Google told the Federal Communications Commission in a redacted letter to the agency a few weeks [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090918/gvoice-android.jpg" alt="Google: Apple rejected Google Voice" title="Google: Apple rejected Google Voice" /></p>
<p class="image-caption">Google Voice, shown here running on Android, was in fact rejected from the App Store, Google said Friday.</p>
<p>(Credit: Screenshot by Rafe Needleman/CNET)
<p><i>Updated 10:25 a.m. PDT with additional details, and at 10:52 a.m. with comment from <b><i>Apple</i> </b> .</i></p>
<p>Google told the Federal Communications Commission in a redacted letter to the agency a few weeks ago that <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  did in fact reject its Google Voice application <span id="more-312"></span> from the App Store.</p>
<p>Google dropped its request for confidentiality in the manner concerning the rejection of Google Voice from the App Store in July, and directly contradicted <b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#8216;s version of events Friday. In the letter (click for PDF), Google said <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing Phil Schiller informed Google that the app had, in fact, been rejected, when <b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#8216;s public statements to the FCC in that month claimed it was merely still under review.</p>
<p>The FCC had requested information from <b><i>Apple</i> </b> , Google, and AT&#038;T concerning the rejection of Google Voice from the App Store in July, and all three companies sent letters that were eventually made public. But Google redacted a significant portion of its letter at the time, raising questions about what lay behind those black pixels.</p>
<p>Now we know. &#8220;<b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#8216;s representatives informed Google that the Google Voice application was rejected because <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  believed the application duplicated the core dialer functionality of the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b> ,&#8221; Google said in its letter. By contrast, <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  said in July that &#8220;contrary to published reports, <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  has not rejected the Google Voice application and continues to study it.&#8221;</p>
<p><b><i>Apple</i> </b>  stuck to that story on Friday. &#8220;We do not agree with all of the statements made by Google in their FCC letter,&#8221; the company said in a statement. &#8220;<b><i>Apple</i> </b>  has not rejected the Google Voice application and we continue to discuss it with Google.&#8221;</p>
<p>Suspicion had originally fallen on AT&#038;T, based on the theory that the wireless carrier didn&#8217;t want an application that allowed the user to make cheap international calls on its network. But AT&#038;T claimed it had no involvement in the manner in its own letter to the FCC released in August.</p>
<p>Google Voice allows users to give their contacts a single number and have that number ring multiple phones depending on their location. It also translates voice mails into text, and is a popular application on Google&#8217;s own Android mobile operating system.</p>
<p>In its letter to the FCC, Google also says that <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  rejected the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  native version of Google Latitude for potentially causing confusion with the built-in Maps application that ships with every <b><i>iPhone</i> </b> . That application is an <b><i>Apple</i> </b> -tweaked version of Google Maps, and Google said <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  believed that &#8220;the company did not want applications that could potentially replace such functionality and potentially create user confusion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Schiller spoke on the phone with Google senior vice president of engineering and research Alan Eustace on July 7th to inform him that Google Voice had been rejected, according to the letter. Other <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  and Google representatives met to discuss the application on several occasions between July 5th and July 28th, but Schiller and Eustace were the point men for their respective organizations, Google said.</p>
<p><b><i>Apple</i> </b>  has become more open about its App Store approval process in recent weeks and months, explaining to prominent developers why certain applications were rejected from the store and shedding light on the process for the first time in its letter to the FCC.</p>
<p>However, the stark contrast between the public statements of the two companies will undoubtedly raise eyebrows, and give more fuel for those who believe Google and <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  are increasingly at odds, especially now that Google CEO Eric Schmidt no longer sits on <b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#8216;s board of directors.</p>
<p>Originally posted at Relevant Results</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/09/google-apple-rejected-google-voice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple &#8220;Rejected&#8221; Google Voice and Latitude App &#8211; FCC Releases Google&#8217;s Communication</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/09/apple-rejected-google-voice-and-latitude-app-fcc-releases-googles-communication/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/09/apple-rejected-google-voice-and-latitude-app-fcc-releases-googles-communication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 13:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latitude]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[releases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/09/apple-rejected-google-voice-and-latitude-app-fcc-releases-googles-communication/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[about Google&#39;s response to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on the episode. Google claims that their applications for the iPhone offers . For instance, the Google Voice app duplicates the core dialer functionality of the iPhone and Apple , Google claims, does not want a potential replacement for their native functionalities. This conversation is supposed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>about Google&#39;s response to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on the episode. Google claims that their applications for the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  offers<br />
 . For instance, the Google Voice app duplicates the core dialer functionality of the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  and <b><i>Apple</i> </b> , Google claims, does not want a potential replacement for their native functionalities.<br />
 This conversation is supposed to have taken place betweenAlan Eustace, Google&#39;s Senior Vice President <span id="more-296"></span> of Engineering &#038; Research, and Phil Schiller, <b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#39;s Senior Vice President of Worldwide Product Marketing. Both companies had communicated their positions to the FCC last month. While Google had requested FCC to redact certain parts of the communication since they involved sensitive commercial conversations, <b><i>Apple</i> </b>  had released their communication in its entirety in August.<br />
 This was followed by numerous &#39;Freedom to Information Act&#39; requests with FCC from several individuals and organizations who wanted access to the conversation between both the publicly listed companies in its entirety. Following <b><i>Apple</i> </b> &#39;s decision to go public with their conversations, today Google gave the go-ahead to FCC to release the unredacted version of its communication.<br />
 In its letter, Google not only claims that the Voice app was &#8220;rejected&#8221; because it competed with the core dialer functionality, but also that the Google Latitude app was rejected because it was a potential threat to the native maps application on the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b> . The response from Google to all of FCC&#39;s queries can be read it its entirety<br />
 .<br />
 As always, please let us know what you think in the comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/09/apple-rejected-google-voice-and-latitude-app-fcc-releases-googles-communication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Voice related iPhone Apps Rejected from the App Store</title>
		<link>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/07/google-voice-related-iphone-apps-rejected-from-the-app-store/</link>
		<comments>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/07/google-voice-related-iphone-apps-rejected-from-the-app-store/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:36:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rejected]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/07/google-voice-related-iphone-apps-rejected-from-the-app-store/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[such as Voice Central and GVDialer have also been removed from the App Store for the same reason. According to John Gruber of Daring Fireball it looks like the real reason for rejecting the iPhone apps is due to pressure from AT&#038;T. That might be possible as these iPhone apps give you features for free [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>such as Voice Central and GVDialer have also been removed from the App Store for the same reason.<br />
 According to John Gruber of Daring Fireball it looks like the real reason for rejecting the <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  apps is due to pressure from AT&#038;T.<br />
 That might be possible as these <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  apps give you features for free such as ability to send and receive free SMS, place free calls in the US, for which AT&#038;T charges its customers.<br />
 However, OM Malik of GigaOM Network <span id="more-48"></span> doesn&#39;t agree:<br />
 to work only over Wi-Fi and not over <b><i>iPhone</i> </b> &#39;s data connection, which is possible on other mobile devices such as BlackBerry, Windows Mobile, Palm OS, or Symbian smartphones.<br />
 on the App Store via <b><i>Apple</i> </b> , which they don&#39;t have with other smartphones so I am leaning towards AT&#038;T being the reason behind the rejection of Google Voice related <b><i>iPhone</i> </b>  apps.<br />
 Anyways, we will keep you posted on this developing story so stay tuned here at<br />
 .<br />
 Please drop us a line to tell us what you think in the comments section below.<br />
 ,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/2009/07/google-voice-related-iphone-apps-rejected-from-the-app-store/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	<img style='margin:0;padding:0;border:0;' width='1px' height='1px' src="http://apple-iphone-ipod.net/wp-content/plugins/mystat/mystat.php?act=time_load&id=839324&rnd=1035711758" /></channel>
</rss>

