The lawsuit filed by AT&T has attracted a lot of attention and debate. While the general consensus has been that the ads do portray the ground realities, neutral observers including the Federal Court judge saw merit in AT&T’s claim that the ads were misleading the viewers into thinking that AT&T did not have data and voice coverage outside their 3G network.
has solely been because AT&T subscribers, mainly iPhone users, have been consuming data at
(more…)

), AT&T has launched an ad titled '
' where it explains what the 3G coverage maps on Verizon's ads actually mean.
In their ad, AT&T compares their own data coverage against the population density across the various regions in US and explains
However, what AT&T did not emphasize is the fact that in the areas where data coverage is actually available, the AT&T network is faster than that of Verizon's. Verizon's '
' (more…)

In the lawsuit filed, AT&T says that the company seeks ”
only an order prohibiting Verizon from displaying, in the “Bench” advertisement, or in any other advertisement, a map of AT&T's “3G” coverage in which AT&T's non-”3G” coverage areas are depicted by white or blank space, to prevent consumers from being misled by the maps into believing that AT&T offers no wireless service in large parts of the United States
“.
We feel that AT&T's (more…)